|From the ERIC database
The Assessment of Entering Students. ERIC Fact Sheet, No. 6.
Because of the open-door policy, community colleges bear the brunt of the poorly prepared students entering higher education (Cohen and Brawer, 1982). Once enrolled, these students often struggle along with their studies, despite serious skill deficiencies. In a survey of 6,426 students in a large, urban community college district, Friedlander (1981) found that of the students who did not feel confident in one or more skill areas, less than 30% took advantage of a remediating support service. Today, many educators feel that colleges operating under open-door policies have a responsibility to identify underprepared students and to see that they get the developmental support necessary for educational success.
WHAT SHOULD BE ASSESSED?
WHO SHOULD BE ASSESSED?
WHAT ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES CAN BE USED?
A wide variety of standardized tests are available. Some of the more well known tests (which are reviewed by Roueche and Archer) include the American College Testing Battery (ACT), the California Achievement Test, the Iowa Test of Basic Skills, the Nelson-Denny Reading Test, the Strong Vocational Interest Blank, and the Brown-Holtzman Survey of Study Habits and Attitudes. While these instruments provide ready-made tools for assessment, tests users are often not informed about the scope, reliability, and validity of published tests. Opinions of professionals at other colleges are a good source of information about assessment instruments. Published reviews of tests in the Eighth Mental Measurement Yearbook (1978), Reading Tests and Reviews II (1975), and Intelligence Test and Reviews (1978) are also sources of information; each is edited by Oscar Buros and published by the Gryphon Press. In addition, the ERIC database provides current reviews and descriptions of tests, programs, and procedures.
Many colleges develop their own assessment instruments on the basis of cognitive and affective competencies that their faculty feel are requisite to classroom and program success. While such instruments may be tailored to the unique needs of an individual college, norms (with which the validity of the test is measured) can be determined only after the test has been applied numerous times. Nonetheless, locally designed tests, descriptions of which may be found through a search of the ERIC database, remain a primary means of assessing entering students at two-year colleges (Roueche and Archer).
WHO SHOULD DO THE ASSESSING?
Cramer and Liberty (1980, p. 20) recommend that all assessment activities be conducted "from a single, centrally accessible location, preferably in the Student Services area" and that "one person be charged with overseeing all aspects of assessment." Roueche and Archer (1979) note the importance of a comfortable testing environment and stress that assessment personnel know how to make students feel at ease, to properly interpret test results, and to explain the results without discouraging the student. Persons in charge of assessment should protect the confidentiality of the assessment results and assure that these results are used appropriately.
HOW ARE ASSESSMENT RESULTS UTILIZED?
Colleges, having identified students in need of remediation, usually pursue one or more of the following approaches to remediation: (1) requiring the students to take remedial courses prior to enrolling in content area courses; (2) allowing students to take a limited number of content area courses while in remediation; or (3) providing coordinated remedial and content area instruction.
WHERE CAN I FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION?
ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH PLACEMENT EXAMINATIONS: A STUDY. SAN
MATEO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BASIC SKILLS PROJECT. San
Mateo, CA: San Mateo Community College District, 1978. 69p. ED 148 424.
Cohen, Arthur M. and Florence B. Brawer. THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1982.
Cramer, Ray and Susan Liberty. A PLAN FOR IMPROVING
INSTRUCTION AND SERVICES FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SKILLS STUDENTS AT
FRESNO CITY COLLEGE. Fresno, CA: Fresno City College, 1981. 72p.
ED 207 656.
Friedlander, Jack. WHY DON'T POORLY PREPARED STUDENTS SEEK HELP? Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Community Colleges, 1981. 14p. ED 203 901.
Hendrick, Larry. AN INTEGRATED STUDENT DIAGNOSIS AND
INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL: A SUPPLEMENTARY PAPER TO THE EDUCATIONAL
PROGRAMS REPORT OF THE LOS RIOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MASTER
PLAN. Sacramento, CA: Los Rios Community College District, 1980.
42p. ED 188 731.
Johnson, Jerome A. and others. ONE STATE'S EFFORTS TO GET
SERIOUS ABOUT THE HIGH RISK STUDENT: ASSESSMENT, FACULTY ADVISING,
CAREER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTAL EDUCATION IN OREGON'S COMMUNITY
COLLEGES. Salem, OR: Oregon State Department of Education, 1980. 133p.
ED 188 732.
Linthicum, Dorothy S. DUNDALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEVELOPMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH PROJECT. Baltimore, MD: Dundalk Community College, 1980. 92p. ED 206 332.
Roueche, John E. and Patricia F. Archer. "Entry Level Assessment in Colleges." COMMUNITY COLLEGE REVIEW Spring 1979, 6(4), 15-27.
Roueche, Suanne D. and Veronica Nora Comstock. A REPORT ON
THEORY AND METHOD FOR THE STUDY OF LITERATURE DEVELOPMENT IN
COMMUNITY COLLEGES. Austin, TX: Department of Educational
Administration, 1981. 505p. ED 211 161
Title: The Assessment of Entering Students. ERIC Fact Sheet, No. 6.
Descriptors: Community Colleges; * Evaluation Criteria; * Evaluation Methods; Evaluation Needs; * Minimum Competencies; Remedial Instruction; Standardized Tests; Standards; * Student Evaluation; Two Year College Students; Two Year Colleges
Identifiers: ERIC Digests
©1999-2012 Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. All rights reserved. Your privacy is guaranteed at