ERIC Identifier: ED464804
Publication Date: 2001-08-00
Author: Ozgun-Koca, S. Asli
Source: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education Columbus OH.
The Graphing Skills of Students in Mathematics and Science Education. ERIC Digest.
"Instructional programs from prekindergarten through grade 12 should enable all students to:
* create and use representations to organize, record, and communicate mathematical ideas;
* select, apply, and translate among mathematical representations to solve problems;
* use representations to model and interpret physical, social, and mathematical phenomena." (NCTM, 2000, p. 66)
The effective use of representations in mathematics and science education has gained more importance as we enter the new millennium. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics even added, Representation, to their four process standards which "highlight ways of acquiring and using content knowledge" (NCTM, 2000, p.29) in their new reform document, "Principles and Standards for School Mathematics". Even though all types of representations are being encouraged in the teaching and learning of mathematics and science, graphical representations play a special role.
Graphs can summarize very complex information or relationship very effectively. Although graphs are explicitly taught in mathematics classrooms as an end in themselves, many subject areas such as science or social studies utilize graphs to represent and interpret relationships. So being able to interpret or construct graphical representations is a crucial skill for every student whether they want to pursue science or mathematics related careers. However, many researchers detected that many students lack graphing skills.
Brasell and Rowe (1993) studied high school physics
students' graphing skills and they concluded that "[students] do not
understand the fundamental properties and functions of graphs in
representing relationships among variables." Their facility with
graphs was generally superficial, grounded on a few, simplistic
algorithms such as plotting data points" (p. 69). Janvier was one
of the first mathematics educators to mention the problems that
students have in interpreting graphs (Bell & Janvier, 1981; Janvier,
1981). Mostly he argues how global meanings of graphs and
interpreting graphs are left out in mathematics classrooms, while
reading data and constructing and reading certain points on graphs
Mokros & Tinker (1987) studied the effects of MBLs in students' understandings about graphing. The use of an MBL or CBL allows student to collect real-time physical data such as temperature, motion, light, or sound. Then these data can be transferred into a computer or a calculator to be studied through a variety of representations such as graphs or tables. They conclude that "in three-month longitudinal study of MBL, students showed a significant gain in understanding on 16 graphing items, although the instruction targeted science topics, not graphing skills" (p. 369). They add that "MBL may also help children develop graphing skills because it eliminates the drudgery of graph production" (pp. 381-382).
Dugdale (1993) discusses the potentials for graphing software, such as Green Globs, to enhance students' understanding of functional and graphical relationships. Green Globs is a game where 13 "green globs" are randomly placed on the grid. Players earn points by entering equations that pass through as many green globs as possible. She argues that it is crucial to go beyond plotting and reading points to interpret the graphs. Sivasubramaniam (1999) compares students' graphing skills in a learning experiment with and without the use of computers. The paper concludes that "the computer group improved significantly more than the paper group in their graphing skills from the pretest to posttest."
Many educators went beyond teaching graphs as an end to
themselves and used a graphing approach to teach other mathematical
or scientific subjects. Oakes (1997) suggests an approach in
teaching which combines the discovery method with graphing skills in
science instruction which "allows students to discover the actual
laws of nature rather than be given the equation and just plug in
data" (p. 35). Hollar and Norwood (1999) use graphing calculators in
teaching algebra with a graphing approach curriculum in which they
could focus on real-world situations. They concluded that the
students in the graphing approach curriculum showed better
understanding of functions than the traditional
This site provides one of the electronic NCTM examples which are interactive activities that support Principle and Standards for School Mathematics.
Spreadsheets and graphing software include tools for organizing, representing, and comparing data. This activity illustrates how weather data can be collected and examined using these tools. In the first part, Collecting and Examining Weather Data, students organize and then examine data that has been collected over a period of time in a spreadsheet. In the second part, Representing and Interpreting Data, students use the graphing functions of a spreadsheet to help them interpret data. Students learn to set up a simple spreadsheet and use it in posing and solving problems, examining data, and investigating patterns, as described in the Representation Standard.
* NCTM's indexes for GRAPHS and GRAPHING list articles that have appeared in three journals:
"Mathematics Teacher" (8-14 grade levels)
"Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School"
"Teaching Children Mathematics" (K-6 grade levels)
* Graphing Activities
This site contains ideas for 18 graphing activities.
* Graphing Equations From Software (SMILE)
Author: James Webb, Harlan High School
A lesson designed to reinforce previously learned equation-graphing skills; and to develop new strategies (other than memorizing equations) for equation graphing, using "Green Globs" software.
* Interactive Algebra
Author: Robert Bunge
Java applets for practicing equations, factoring, and graphing skills, with multiple levels in each category.
Activities create real-time correlations between equations and graphs that help students visualize and experiment with many of the major concepts from elementary algebra through pre-calculus.
This site provides Shockwave (tm) interactive activities which offer real-time correlations between equations and graphs that help students visualize and experiment with many scientific concepts for grades K to 12.
* Valentine Candy Count (CEC)
Author: Judy Dale; Bosque Farms Elementary, Bosque Farms, N.M.
This site offers an activity for grades 1-4 in which students
observe, sort, and predict by using Valentine candy. It uses a
method through which children can explore and internalize graphing
Brasell, H. M., & Rowe, M. B. (1993). Graphing skills among high school students. "School Science and Mathematics," 93(2), p. 63-70.
Dudgale, S. (1993). Functions and graphs-Perspectives on students thinking. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. P. Carpenter (Eds.) "Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions" (pp. 101-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Janvier, C. (1981). Use of situations in mathematics education. "Educational Studies in Mathematics," 12, 113-122.
Mokros, J. R., & Tinker, R. F. (1987). The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs. "Journal of Research in Science Teaching," 24(4), 369-383. NCTM (2000). "Principles and standards for school mathematics." Reston, VA: Author.
Oakes, J. M. (1997). Discovery through graphing. "The Science Teacher," 64(1), 33-35.
Sivasubramaniam, P. (1999). "Computers and graphing skills in the light of learning theories." [Available online at http://www.edweb.co.uk/bcme/proceedings/research/sivasubramanium.htm ]
This digest was funded by the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, under contract no. ED-99-CO-0024. Opinions expressed in this digest do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of OERI or the U.S. Department of Education.
Title: The Graphing Skills of Students in Mathematics and Science Education. ERIC Digest.
Document Type: Information Analyses---ERIC Information Analysis Products (IAPs) (071); Information Analyses---ERIC Digests (Selected) in Full Text (073);
Available From: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, 1929 Kenny Road, Columbus, OH 43210-1080. Tel: 800-276-0462 (Toll Free); Fax: 614-292-0263; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; Web site: http://www.ericse.org.
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Educational Technology, Elementary Secondary Education, Graphing Calculators, Graphs, Mathematics Education, Science Education, Skill Development, World Wide Web
Identifiers: ERIC Digests
©1999-2012 Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. All rights reserved. Your privacy is guaranteed at